Showing posts with label political action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political action. Show all posts
Friday, November 23, 2012
OccupyThanksgiving2012
OCCUPY THANKSGIVING 2012
Labels:
activism,
donate,
food,
food politics,
oakland,
occupy,
political action
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Protest Bank of America
From the rally in favor of Credit Unions on May 9th, 2012.
Slideshow of protest signs and people.
Video of participant 1
Video of participant 2
Video of participant 3
Video of participant 4
Video of participant 5
Slideshow of protest signs and people.
Video of participant 1
Video of participant 2
Video of participant 3
Video of participant 4
Video of participant 5
Thursday, May 3, 2012
The Police Have Turned Bandits
View more presentations from climbert8.
See my post about OccupySF's MayDay March, from which the above photos have been taken.
See my post about OccupySF's MayDay March, from which the above photos have been taken.
Labels:
activism,
jeanette winterson,
justice,
occupy,
police action,
political action,
politics,
written body
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
OccupySF May Day March and Commune
On market, nearing Van Ness. The atmosphere is sunny, windy and festive.
The nice SFPD has sent the nice police people to escort us. I wonder why they have their riot helmets? I greet some of the cops and thank them for being there.
Lily had just been to the OccupyThe Farm plot in Berkeley/Albany, where there were a lot of families and programs for kids. Various established community gardens in SF are donating starters to the farm. See a great article on the Gill Tract Farm.
Extract from the "Occupy The Farm" site above: "
Occupy the Farm, a coalition of local residents, farmers, students, researchers, and activists are planting over 15,000 seedlings at the Gill Tract, the last remaining 10 acres of Class I agricultural soil in the urbanized East Bay area. The Gill Tract is public land administered by the University of California, which plans to sell it to private developers.
For decades the UC has thwarted attempts by community members to transform the site for urban sustainable agriculture and hands-on education. With deliberate disregard for public interest, the University administrators plan to pave over this prime agricultural soil for commercial retail space, a Whole Foods, and a parking lot."
Faces in the march:
| The picture depicts farmers protesting against Monsanto. |
This Colombian had just attended the AM's rally for immigrant rights in the Mission. He'd been at the pre-rally the evening before, which was supposed to have been an opportunity for Occupy and Immigrants' Rights people to get together, but, as many of you have seen, it ended up getting hijacked by violence on Valencia.
| THIS MEANS YOU! |
| Heading north on Van Ness |
| Eduardo Galeano cameo appearance in the crowd. |
| The cops lined up on the sidewalk, and didn't interfere with |
| the takeover of the abandoned ArchDiocese building. This is not a Liberation Theology church, it doesn't seem. |
Long video (almost 4 mins) of walk through the building.
During the march, there was a police escort of 3-4 motorcycles in front, and a single file of about 30 cops on each flank of the marchers. Soon after the building had been taken over, most of the cops seemed to disappear, there were about 15 left milling about and videographing the entrance and crowd from the opposite sidewalk. But cops never mill about, they never just disappear, and I'll confess to being nervous.
| The feeding of the people. |
| This man brought 8 trays of food to the commune. |
| The chain link fence was taken down peaceably, not torn down. |
| A poster inside the building, Top |
| Bottom. |
| I just loved this! You can add Bhagat Singh, Tupac Amaru, Steve Biko ... |
| The woman on the right is a what-passes-for-a-journalist for KGO/FOX, who went around asking what I considered antagonistic and provocative questions. |
| The entrance. |
| People on the second floor, playing music. Yes, I do realise its similarity to Munich Olympics 1972. Without comparing or judging the causes, one difference is M/C gun vs. laptop. |
| Puerto Rico Libre! |
| Messages on the sidewalk |
| and on the chain link fence. |
| Uh-oh! Front. |
| Right. |
| Left. They cleared and barricaded the sidewalk. |
| Reinforcements. |
| The embedded journalist again. |
| Videographer for CBS I think. |
| An Occupier asking the police to leave. |
| More barricades. |
| Moving in for action from across the street. |
Since the cops were using the barricades to encircle the occupied building (I'll confess to not having found the courage to stay on the inside.) and pressing people on the inside, confrontations were increasing. The cops would push the barricades in and then say, "Don't touch the barricade!". Batons were lifted and brought down on people who tried to push back against the barricades. I admire the cops for their bravery against overwhelming odds: against colorful skirts, hoop ear-rings, tattoos, masks, bandanas etc. any sane person would go armed with flak jackets, helmets, face shields, batons, guns, tear gas, rubber bullets. Did I already mention that they outnumbered the people by 2:1? To defend an unoccupied building? In a city with numerous homeless and a 60% ILLEGAL foreclosure rate? Of course "Occupy is costing the city millions.".
See a video-poetry version of the following indictment of US Police.
"Our security depends on regulation but the police have turned bandits. They don't obey the rules. (Nor their own mission statement.) They are swarming into civic life. ... The security forces have rebelled. The people are the victim of a coup. ...
Who comes here? Let me hold up my lantern. It's only the police ... just a few of them as always whistling as they go.
The faithful body public has made a mistake. ... Coming up behind are hundreds of them. Hundreds too many, armed to the teeth for a job that doesn't need doing. Not needed? With all that weaponry?
Here they come, hurtling through the lifestream trying to pick a fight. There's no one to fight but you. You're the foreign body now."
-- paraphrased from pg 115, Written on the body, Jeanette Winterson
Bad stuff goes down. Someone on the inside of the building climbed onto the top of the roof and stood there crowing. At some point he picked up some bricks, and periodically held them aloft. The cops took no action, they did not respond to this (for at least 15 minutes) leave alone anticipate this - there were numerous higher vantage points on buildings the cops could have climbed up onto.
We were in the street, facing the building, with the cops lined up 1-2 deep in front of us, any observer would have thought they were protecting us. There were people in the crowd who were shouting to the guy on the roof to get off, that he was not one of us, that he did not represent us. At some point the idiot on the roof, with no warning, threw a brick, I would assume at the cops. The idiot aimed high, the brick sailed over the impassive cops' heads, but only a couple of feet over. I could see it coming in, in seeming slow motion, rotating slowly, I seemed to think there was plenty of time to react, to yell a warning to the guy one person removed from me in the crowd, to move around and push him out of the way. In that millisecond after I spotted the brick over the heads of the very very smartly dressed cops, it was over! The brick smashed into the face of the guy, he fell down, unconscious, two people in the crowd quickly grabbed him, supported his head and dragged him to the sidewalk and started aiding him, with his head on one person's lap.
I didn't have time to respond, I was frozen, didn't see the brick until it was above the cops. Q: Weren't even some of them looking up at the roof, at the idiot in plain sight? A: They hadn't been ordered to. Q: Could none of them, with all their training, have anticipated the brick, responded to it by trying to block it? A: They hadn't been ordered to. Q: Could none of them, helmeted and flak jacketed (and nattily dressed) as they were have thrown their body on the line to save a fellow citizen, as the soldiers in the war movies seem to throw their bodies on a grenade to save their comrades? A: We aren't their comrades. A cop who'd done any of the above would have deserved a commendation for bravery, but ...
Someone in the crowd had called an ambulance, but the surrounding streets had been blocked by cops. It took the cops themselves two minutes to realise someone had been hurt, and one turned around and asked me whether the victim was okay and where he was. I said, "He's right there on the sidewalk.". Five feet away.
In the meantime, an experienced occupier had climbed up on the roof, disarmed the brick-throwing idiot and gotten him to disappear. The crowd yelled deprecations up at the brick-thrower, one young woman next to me was crying, "He doesn't represent us, he's not one of us!" See also OccupySF's response to the violence on Valencia.
So now the cops pulled out their guns (tear-gas and rubber bullets, I was told) and aimed them at the Occupier who'd controlled the brick-thrower. Some of the cops then lowered their sights and aimed them at the people in the windows on the second floor. I and others yelled at the cops to please lower their weapons, that the guy now on the roof had eliminated the cockerel brick-thrower. No avail.
Soon we were herded onto a street corner, and then off the sidewalk onto the street! Just earlier, I'd noticed the motto on the arm-badge:
ORO EN PAZ, FIERRO EN GUERRA
(GOLD IN PEACE, IRON IN WAR).
I'd started shouting their motto back at them, repeating it three times, sometimes in English, and then adding, "ESTO NO ES GUERRA, ESTO ES PAZ, QUE SEAIS DE ORO." (THIS IS NOT WAR, THIS IS PEACE, BE GOLD!)
A police higher up approached me, I told him, "You are stronger than us, hold your peace." He said he was only moving us off the street (?), "Everything had changed."
![]() |
| The civil suit is a reporter. |
![]() |
| The brave, the few. |
Huffington Post
So an empty building has been rescued from use by homeless via the massive deployment of police force. Was that expense necessary, given the situation of the homeless in SF?
Meanwhile in Oakland
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
WhyActForJudicialJustice
After reading this, please learn what you can do to act for judicial justice.
A couple of weeks ago a petition to “Save Dharun Ravi” appeared to get wide circulation amongst the Indian and Indian American community. The group on which I first saw this is not given to any kind of political commentary, petitioning or action. In spite of the seeming broad-mindedness of the original appeal :
I questioned the motives of the re-broadcasters:
RST: “There are tens of thousands of other innocents in US jails and on death row, why
does this one in particular deserve my attention and the withdrawal of that
attention from the more general problem? Why is it more important to appeal one
_flawed_ instance of justice than to overturn the systemic racial and class bias
in US Justice?
If this was some poor Appalachian white boy, a Hispanic gang-banger or an inner
city black would any of us give a shit? Have any of us given a shit? I haven't
so far, why should I start now?”
To which, a response was
H8': “What you are saying seems to be that there are so many injustices out there so if one doesn't take up cudgels to oppose all of them, one has no standing to protest when one is stirred by a particular "sufficiently close" injustice.”
RST: No, what I am saying, by way of analogy, is that prevention (of an epidemic) is better than amelioration (of individual cases).
H8': “Tate,
Look
at all the attention you have given already.
If you have the time, you can give attention to every innocent. I would like to do the same, but probably won't be able to find the time.”
RST: The right wing strategy on this and every other issue is to force us to dissipate our energy and bandwidth on individual cases (and states), and it explains your apathy, “I can't do everything, so I will do nothing.”
H8': “Honestly, this one got my attention only because of the Indian origin, and it is a college close to my current home, where children of many friends study.”
RST: Nuff said?
H8': “I agree I would probably not give my attention if he was of a different country or origin. But I am sure that for them, their friends/country folks must be doing what I am trying to do.”
RST: Ummm, see Martin Niemöller.
H8': “I cannot possibly "overturn the systemic racial and class bias in US Justice" ”
RST: I agree, neither can I; not as isolated individuals, but together perhaps, we can. And, “a good fight should be fought for its merits, not abandoned because of its unwinnability.” - which is what Krishna said to Arjun in the Gita (or should have).
H8': “But this small thing, yes I can do.”
RST: Wonderful! And you can do much more!
A couple of weeks ago a petition to “Save Dharun Ravi” appeared to get wide circulation amongst the Indian and Indian American community. The group on which I first saw this is not given to any kind of political commentary, petitioning or action. In spite of the seeming broad-mindedness of the original appeal :
“Instead
of drawing lines in the sand and taking sides, let's come together as
people and prove that we can make tough decisions and show some
compassion, understanding, and sympathy.
Please sign
this if you believe that equality and tolerance should be
achieved through honest, open communication and not through a vicious
and vengeful prosecution that only serves to fuel tempers and
alienate us even further.”,
I questioned the motives of the re-broadcasters:
RST: “There are tens of thousands of other innocents in US jails and on death row, why
does this one in particular deserve my attention and the withdrawal of that
attention from the more general problem? Why is it more important to appeal one
_flawed_ instance of justice than to overturn the systemic racial and class bias
in US Justice?
If this was some poor Appalachian white boy, a Hispanic gang-banger or an inner
city black would any of us give a shit? Have any of us given a shit? I haven't
so far, why should I start now?”
To which, a response was
H8': “First
they came for the Hispanic gang banger and I did not speak out. Then
they came for the Applachian white boy and I did not speak out. Then
they came for the inner city black kid and I did not speak out. Then
they came for Dharun Ravi and I said,
why should I
start now?”
I thought there seemed to be some
misunderstanding, and tried to explain:
RST: “My point, and Niemöller's,
is precisely the opposite of how you seem to construe it. If you wait
to protest until they come for you (or someone "sufficiently"
like you - are not most other human beings sufficiently like you?) it
is TOO LATE. You should speak out against injustice when it starts,
you should protest injustice when you first become aware of it, and
you should make yourself aware of it (by distrusting the MSM,
authority, the official line; by being skeptical of what you hear) so
as to not be caught unawares. By all means go ahead and sign the
petition to Obumama pleading for Dharun Ravi if you are so moved,
but I fear that we, the Indian community, will only come across as
insular, ignorant, idiots for attempting to use our clout over such a
triviality.
Unless ...
Unless we use this as a starting point for getting involved in something bigger than ourselves, to see this incident as a reason to question authority, use this incident as a catalyst to inform ourselves of the institutional racist and classist biases and to show that we do also care about Hispanic and Native American men sentenced to death on trumped up charges and planted evidence, that we care about black men sentenced to death in spite of contrary genetic evidence.”
Unless ...
Unless we use this as a starting point for getting involved in something bigger than ourselves, to see this incident as a reason to question authority, use this incident as a catalyst to inform ourselves of the institutional racist and classist biases and to show that we do also care about Hispanic and Native American men sentenced to death on trumped up charges and planted evidence, that we care about black men sentenced to death in spite of contrary genetic evidence.”
H8': “What you are saying seems to be that there are so many injustices out there so if one doesn't take up cudgels to oppose all of them, one has no standing to protest when one is stirred by a particular "sufficiently close" injustice.”
RST: No, what I am saying, by way of analogy, is that prevention (of an epidemic) is better than amelioration (of individual cases).
H8': “Tate,
If you have the time, you can give attention to every innocent. I would like to do the same, but probably won't be able to find the time.”
RST: The right wing strategy on this and every other issue is to force us to dissipate our energy and bandwidth on individual cases (and states), and it explains your apathy, “I can't do everything, so I will do nothing.”
H8': “Honestly, this one got my attention only because of the Indian origin, and it is a college close to my current home, where children of many friends study.”
RST: Nuff said?
H8': “I agree I would probably not give my attention if he was of a different country or origin. But I am sure that for them, their friends/country folks must be doing what I am trying to do.”
RST: Ummm, see Martin Niemöller.
H8': “I cannot possibly "overturn the systemic racial and class bias in US Justice" ”
RST: I agree, neither can I; not as isolated individuals, but together perhaps, we can. And, “a good fight should be fought for its merits, not abandoned because of its unwinnability.” - which is what Krishna said to Arjun in the Gita (or should have).
H8': “But this small thing, yes I can do.”
RST: Wonderful! And you can do much more!
A
supportive friend rightly pointed out my high-mindedness in this and
challenged me to come up with an action on the broader issues I
raised that we as a community could participate in. But he
immediately cast doubt on the viability of anything beyond the
“Dharun Ravi” petition by wondering whether it would get any
traction within the Indian-American community.
The
answer to that doubt, I don't know. It will be determined by how
you
respond and act. Let's show that we can act from a higher principle,
that of human rights for all,
in the tradition established by Ashoka, promulgated by Akbar and
eloquently described by Amartya.
Inform yourself, involve yourself and ACT!
(Will send you to a post with links to 'action' websites.)
(Will send you to a post with links to 'action' websites.)
Labels:
judicial justice,
justice,
political action,
politics
ActForJudicialJustice
This is mostly directed at the Indian and Indian-American community, that circulated a petition to "Free Dharun Ravi".
The history behind my appeal here.
Let's show that we can act from a higher principle, that of human rights for all, in the tradition established by Ashoka, promulgated by Akbar and eloquently described by Amartya.
The history behind my appeal here.
Let's show that we can act from a higher principle, that of human rights for all, in the tradition established by Ashoka, promulgated by Akbar and eloquently described by Amartya.
Here
are just three of the most effective organizations
working on miscarriage of justice, racially skewed sentencing, prison
conditions, death penalty, prosecutorial abuse etc. For all three, I
give some combination of examples of what is the problem, what is
being done to fix it and what you can do to help.
If
you want to join me in any local action, or even just to observe and
counteract the MSM brain-washing we've already undergone, I've
included links to various OccupyOakland sites.
Finally,
links to The Nation (which H.C.Baxi got me hooked onto). Other
reading is obvious: Harper's, Mother Jones, TomDispatch …
A few of Amnesty International's
actions in the US:
Arizona
prison conditions : Arizona's maximum security prisons fall below
international standards for humane treatment, windowless cells for 22
to 24 hours a day in conditions of reduced sensory stimulation, with
little access to natural light and no work, educational or
rehabilitation programs, prisoners spend years in such conditions, AI
calls for :
- reducing the number of prisoners in isolation;
- improving conditions in the SMU and similar units;
- removing prisoners with serious mental illness from SMU or similar units;
- taking measures to reduce the number of suicides in Arizona’s prisons, and
- barring children under 18 from being held in solitary
confinement.
Death
Penalty: United States stayed in its
dubiously bad place … behind China, Iran,
Saudi Arabia and Iraq
Simple things you can do: Educate
yourself on the
issues, 10 ways to get
involved : sign a
petition, donate,
attend an event and put
your body on the line.
What AI has to say about
Mumbai slums
B. Southern
Poverty Law Center: The
Southern Poverty Law Center is a nonprofit civil rights organization
dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry, and to seeking justice for
the most vulnerable members of society.
Get
informed: e.g. walking
while black, “Sub-human. Disposable. Even in the larger world.
Trayvon was returning from buying candy and iced tea at a nearby
convenience store, walking through a gated community in Sanford where
his father was staying. He was presumed to be up to no good. His
assailant, George Zimmerman, has been presumed by local police to
have acted in self-defense.”
donate,
learn how to speak
out against bigotry
C.
The Innocence Project
: The Innocence Project works to exonerate the wrongfully
convicted through postconviction DNA testing; and develop and
implement reforms to prevent wrongful convictions.
Know
(reading
list),
Common forms of misconduct by law
enforcement officials include:
• Employing suggestion when conducting identification procedures
• Coercing false confessions
• Lying or intentionally misleading jurors about their observations
• Failing to turn over exculpatory evidence to prosecutors
• Providing incentives to secure unreliable evidence from informants
Common forms of misconduct by prosecutors include:
• Withholding exculpatory evidence from defense
• Deliberately mishandling, mistreating or destroying evidence
• Allowing witnesses they know or should know are not truthful to testify
• Pressuring defense witnesses not to testify
• Relying on fraudulent forensic experts
• Making misleading arguments that overstate the probative value of testimony
• Employing suggestion when conducting identification procedures
• Coercing false confessions
• Lying or intentionally misleading jurors about their observations
• Failing to turn over exculpatory evidence to prosecutors
• Providing incentives to secure unreliable evidence from informants
Common forms of misconduct by prosecutors include:
• Withholding exculpatory evidence from defense
• Deliberately mishandling, mistreating or destroying evidence
• Allowing witnesses they know or should know are not truthful to testify
• Pressuring defense witnesses not to testify
• Relying on fraudulent forensic experts
• Making misleading arguments that overstate the probative value of testimony
Fix,
simplest way to get-involved and make a difference is to join
and to donate
Act Locally: If
there is one local group you will join
OccupyOakland
: This is the other side of the coin: without grassroots protest and
action, organizations like the above will continue to exist and have
to fight individual cases. And to change the system, the grassroots
(we, us, you and I) need you to participate.
Justice
related issues: sexual harassment lawsuit against Alameda County
Chief Probation Officer, Human Trafficking measure for CA ballot,
“Oscar Grant, Trayvon Martin, and the protection of ‘police
murder’ in America (Opinion)”
“Mumia Abu Jamal, Leonard Peltier, Angela Davis”
if these names make your blood boil, you have a minimum GAWAS-ness of
8.
Articles from The
Nation: I consider this a central clearing house for
information and activism on human rights, social justice and
progressive issues. Typically at least 3 months ahead of the NYT.
(HCBaxi was the one who led me to
subscribe to and read The Nation, basically by ripping out articles
for me to read, from his copies. After the WTC attacks, The Nation
(amongst a few others) was the only US print media I could bear to
read: they condemned the violence (not the “loss of innocent
lives”), analyzed and acknowledged the causes and discussed
possible responses. I pledged to subscribe to it lifelong.)
On “License
to Kill”
On YOUR tax dollars at work for
Arizona's
private prisons
On abolishing the US
Death Penalty
Patricia Williams Reason
for doubt. Can't read it? Subscribe,
$18 a year for online
How to end the Drug
Wars
Reliable news on Occupy
: if you only listen to NPR, you are NOT hearing it all.
_____________________________
This is meant for those of you who want to do something, but don't know what nor how. For the rest, please explore on your own, I do not want to influence or mediate your reading any further. Find your own articles with contrary viewpoints, for example those defending inhumane conditions, the death penalty, violent vigilantism, law enforcement and prosecutorial fraud, and those promulgating hate and bigotry.
_____________________________
This is meant for those of you who want to do something, but don't know what nor how. For the rest, please explore on your own, I do not want to influence or mediate your reading any further. Find your own articles with contrary viewpoints, for example those defending inhumane conditions, the death penalty, violent vigilantism, law enforcement and prosecutorial fraud, and those promulgating hate and bigotry.
Labels:
judicial justice,
justice,
political action,
politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



